Sunday, September 11, 2011
Thursday, September 1, 2011
Wednesday, August 17, 2011
I 'heart' The New Yorker
Wednesday, July 6, 2011
Wednesday, June 1, 2011
Thursday, March 3, 2011
Collaboration is the New Competition
Answer: We need collaboration to increase reach and impact, to inform and ignite. We need to transition from competitive advantage to collaborative advantage.
Today’s incredibly connected world gives us a sense of commons. In today’s merging markets the expectations of consumers are already changing when the self interest is matched against sustainability. We care about the socio-efficient ways of manufacturing. Along that, technologies have dramatically altered the marketplace.
With this global change, profitability has to change also, and companies have to supply the demand for the “green product.” To that end, Alex Bogusky, the former advertizing magnate, has created a digital commons – an area of collaboration, where a group of companies, that by traditional definitions would be considered competitors, come together to encompass ideas of the common community.
Alex Bogusky’s “Common” is a collaborative brand. It brings together a diverse group of stakeholders in a collaborative effort to create new businesses built on sustainability and accountability under the “Common” brand. To have a conversation around what is sustainable people have to be involved. Challenging old ways of working requires more vigorous involvement from all stakeholders.
“Coffee Common” is the new business idea under the “Common” brand. It is a collaboration of people with different opinions but a singular interest – serving great by-the-cup brewed coffee. A diverse group of stakeholders – a coffee farmer, an artisan coffee roaster, a barista and a consumer – have joint together in a collaborative effort to emphasize sustainable farming and fair trade. “Coffee Common” was introduced recently at the TED conference.
The heightened interdependence of today’s world allows the rural agricultural communities worldwide to enter and compete in the high-end marketplace of Europe, America and Asia. High coffee consumption in developing countries gives rise to coffee economy.
Collaboration can be an act that promotes global economic prosperity and cultural exchange. Collaboration shifts control to all stakeholders. Collaboration is the new opportunity; it gives competitive edge and creates win-win situation for all.
Friday, February 11, 2011
Orthodox Capitalism is Dead
The crises we face today, the inability to create new jobs and new industries, are the shortcomings of capitalism as we practice it. Umair Haque, the author of the “New Capitalist Manifesto,” challenges us to recognize the cornerstones of industrial-era capitalism to be able to remake it. “Capitalism is a human creation; we made it and we can remake it. We are at a critical juncture to remake it again.”
Profitability is what we mean by capitalism. To rediscover profitability we need to take a critical look at our competitive advantage. For the next-generation capitalism we need creativity, customization, commitment and compliance. We need to unleash creativity by bringing together diverse constituents to generate new ideas and to reach a creative outcome. We need to redefine consumption methods, like iTunes, and give customized purchasing options to consumers to download a digital album in MP3 format or in a single-file format.
Commitment is a process by which we get people to agree willingly to continue to support something. Companies are in need of commitment and compliance – there is a constant fear that people will go home and not come back. People want a say and to be part of decision making. Companies need to engage employees and encourage “make-our-own rules” approach to decision making processes
The 4 C’s become core characteristics of human interaction – the more active the participation, the more creative the decisions and process outcomes, and the more customized to our needs. Systems by which we make decisions need high degrees of collaboration and participation. This is very different from what we are trained to believe.
Our communication practices are still limited by the legacy of an old design. We favor a form of talk that is an argument, a campaign to win, organized around liberal democracy – it is embedded in our constitution. What we inherited is a 16th - 17th century view of human experience.
Partisanship is an outcome of liberal democratic model – it works to polarize into position. We have a model of how talk should be. Our native theory of dialogue is adversarial talk. We advocate a view, we debate, and the better argument wins.
But having the world we want will not come from voting for it.
So we need to look at the communication designs that are available to us. How we talk to each other and what are the native theories?
Thursday, January 13, 2011
COMM 4600
COMM 4600 - Collaborative Decision Making
Course description from syllabus:
Organizations and communities increasingly use participatory and collaborative forms of decision making to solve complex multi-party conflicts. Communication is core to the quality of all participatory decision making. The course will focus on research and practice. More specifically, the course will explore why the need for collaboration is increasing, the various types and models of collaboration, individual skill needs, and the discussion and deliberation processes that facilitate and limit the success of these programs. As a result of the course, class members should have a better understanding of the changing workplace and its connection to the wider society, an increased capacity to participate in collaborative decision making, and the ability to aid organizations and communities in improving their decision making processes.
The upcoming posts will focus on collaboration!